Tracy here feels that the most important issue in the upcoming election is "the one who has the most faith in the Lord". Not their foreign policy, not their stance on the current economic crisis, not their thoughts on the war in Iraq, but who believes in God more.
But Tracy's ignorance truly shines when explains why she won't be voting for Obama:
"I can't imagine a President of the United States being named President Obama. I really have a problem with that and I'm not the only one."
If you wont vote for someone based on their name, then you should probably rethink voting at all. And what's really sad is that she's right that she's not the only one who has a problem with Obama's name: the "Obama's a Muslim, just look at his name" thing is common among the fundies, despite the fact that he is a Christian.
And she follows up that gem with the following dumbosity:
"His background. A mother that was atheist. Huh, that really gets to me. A father that was a Muslim. That should get to everyone."
So what if his mother was an atheist (is there even any evidence to support that? I've never heard of this)? What does his father's religion matter (there is actually evidence that points to his father being an atheist, actually)? None of these have any bearing on Obama's faith, and Obama's faith has no bearing on how well he could run the country. Again, if this is the reason you're voting against someone, then you should rethink voting at all.